Issue: Imagining / Doing Smart Cities.

January 2022

Editorial: Imagining/doing smart cities

The smart city is, first and foremost, an intention. From the early computing models to regulate transportation flows in the 1950s, up to today’s urban Living Labs, what has underscored smart city projects has been a choice to invest in technological infrastructures with the aim to bring the existing city into a state of smartness. The very act of imagining what is ‘smart’ and the pursuit of this ideal, we suggest, is the essence of smart cities. While the individual technological solutions clearly differ in time and space, what remains is essentially the intention of planning a better future via more efficient and responsive socio-technological systems. This issue of Urban Matters focuses on the act of imagining smartness, and the tensions between imagining and doing ‘smart’ cities. The articles in this issue explore the imagination(s) that push cities to detach from their existing conditions and then project the urban into a future smartness. But the deviance between the existing and the imagined is not only a precondition for smart city projects. It is also a consequence of smart city efforts, in the difference between what was imagined and the resultant reality.

In a thought-provoking photo essay, Fredrik Torisson retraces the history of smart city imagination in its visual representations. By demonstrating how iconic images of the smart city present recurrent similarities, he proposes that smart city imagineering is not futurism proper, but a “representation of futurism”. Rather than creating new versions of the imagined future through a linear progression in time, the same ideas of the future come back in a loop, reproducing “past futures”. In his words: “beyond the metanarrative of progress, we make images of previous expressions of progress”.

Adriana de la Peña takes us to Guadalajara, Mexico, where the smart city imagination met with the creative city discourse, in what was supposed to become the first Mexican Digital Creative City. She guides us through the parabolical journey from the dream to become a global creative industries hub, to a messy reality of lost investments and broken promises.  

Syeda Jenifa Zahan explores the marginalising power of smart city visions in India, where smart cities are consistently treated as the “ideal city of the future”. The area-based development of the Guwahati Smart City is a telling example of how “peripheralised spaces and communities remain largely invisible in smart city plans, discourses and imaginaries”.

In turn, Lorena Melgaço and Camila Freitas de Souza give us a glimpse of a growing niche of smart city developments where the urban poor are instead the focal target group. They present findings from their research on the Brazilian “social smart city”, where private developers are building entire neighbourhoods with the argument of providing social and technological inclusion for low-income Brazilians. They compare the visions and discourse of big corporations with the realities of the everyday lives of inhabitants.

Chiara Valli, relying on conversations with Gillian Rose, Germaine Halegoua, and Linda Gustafsson for the Smart Cities for City Officials project, reflects on alternative ways of knowing, imagining, and co-creating smart cities through a feminist epistemology. The imagination driving smart city intentions should be more rich, nuanced, difference-sensitive and multiple, as “striving for a feminist smart city would be (…) striving for nothing less than a smart feminist city”.

Finally, Guy Baeten in an interview with Rob Kitchin discusses smart cities in relation to the notion of the right to the city. For many governments and private corporations alike, smart city imaginings and actually existing projects are mostly about profits and surveillance. Notions of justice, democracy, and citizen well-being are often pushed to the background, if they are present at all. New surveillance technologies to control movement during the Coronavirus crisis have only reinforced this tendency. Rob Kitchin calls for a tighter cooperation between critical scholars, cities, and citizens to imagine and implement fairer smart cities.

We hope you will enjoy this issue of Urban Matters and we warmly welcome you to have a look at the Beyond Smart Cities Today conference program, organised by IUR. This two-day conference, taking place in Malmö on 16-17 June 2022, aims to provide time and space to question the differences within smart cities, reflect on issues of justice and injustice, analyse social and spatial inequalities through feminist and postcolonial lenses, and underline historical perspectives to situate the smart city in time and place.

Research Article
Smart urbanism and the politics of redevelopment in urban peripheries in India

Introduction Smart urbanisation projects have taken a centre stage in contemporary urban development in India. India’s experimentation with smart urbanisation focuses on five key aspects: wide-spread use of Information and technology (ICT), use of clean technologies, smart governance, involvement of private sector companies such as Accenture and McKinsey, and citizen participation (Engasser and Saunders, 2015). […]

Research Article
Tracing Brazilian (social) smart cities: on conceptualization, implementation, and practices

Introduction Smart cities have now become a pervasive concept for corporations and governments, often alluding to cities of the future: shaped by technology and driven by human and social capital, innovation, and urban development. Following such enthusiasm, academics have been motivated to critically engage with the concept, underscoring some of its shortcomings, such as the […]

Photo essay
Expo 67 on repeat

In Ghosts of My Life (2014), the late cultural critic Mark Fisher elaborated on the critical theorist Franco ‘Bifo’ Berardi’s notion of an era characterised by a ‘slow cancellation of the future’ where the future is understood as the psychological perception of the future (Berardi, 2011). Fisher set up a thought experiment: if a popular […]

Interview
Smart cities, justice and local governance. An interview with Rob Kitchin

The Institute for Urban Research recently put together an online course for city officials working with smart city policies (https://smartcitiesforcityofficials.com/). The course is a collage of interviews with smart city experts and wants to transfer insights from social science research about smart cities to municipal practicioners working with smart city questions on an everyday basis. […]

Commentary
What and who counts in smart city knowledge? A feminist epistemology for smart cities. Reflecting with Gillian Rose, Germaine Halegoua and Linda Gustafsson

In 1966, by making the provocation: “Technology is the answer…but what was the question?”, architect Cedric Price was inviting the audience at his lecture to reconsider the role of technological progress in architecture and planning. 55 years later, with smart city policies on the rise and technology seen as the privileged answer to ever more […]

Research Article
The smart meets the creative — The disappointing parable of the first Digital Creative City in Mexico

In 2012, standing on a podium with a banner that read, “With more technology, we sow the seed for a prosperous Mexico,” the Mexican President at the time, Felipe Calderón, announced that Guadalajara had been chosen to host the Digital Creative City (DCC), the first smart city in Mexico as well as an international hub […]